Відео

😂

Much love to Russia from Slovak Republik! 🇸🇰❤️🇷🇺

So narrowminded person. This is why the generals are bad at politics

Why did Russia liberate Crimea and Donbass? We knew that Russia would not allow a NATO Ukraine. In Donbass and Crimea no one wants to be Ukrainian. And it is also completely clear that Russia is not thinking of moving west, let alone against NATO. It doesn't make sense and they don't have the capacity. Therefore, Mr. General, please stop lying.

Ми в Україні теж не вірили, що путін почне велику війну навіть тоді, коли були скупченні війська біля наших кордонів. Але ця хвора тварина таки почала цю криваву війну!!! І ми платимо дуже велику ціну, бо не були повністю готові до цього! Люди не бажають вірити, що станеться щось погане, але зло існує, і воно існує у хворих на фашизм головах росіян, а не тільки путіна. Будьте пильні, вчиться на чужих помилках!!!

I hope you are wrong about Trump pulling out of Nato. Trump is definitely silly, but he is also unpredictable.

Russia's War Machine is Edging. Next Year, It Busts.

Dr. Jack will lose his job when Farage wins, at least there are books to sell..... Ok, after listening I have to edit my comment, doc is really good, I just expected some fully unrealistic hawkish talk after Turkey comment at the start.

This was a VERY IMPORTANT DISCUSSION! Thank you for bringing this out. I have heard these issues brought up so often but it seems that the support is going in circles.

I had a hunch Russia is fighting because they had a large supply of arms left over from the USSR. It’s the sunk cost fallacy. Once that’s used up, they may be a bit more cooperative. What can Ukraine do to speed up the day Russia is more amenable to a genuine peace? Strike weapons factories? More strikes on refineries? I was thinking cutting supply lines to the front lines will starve the front enough they will collapse. But it looks like that’s hard to do.

so Russia is running out of money in late 2024/ early 2025. So think maybe this whole video is a bit not really that realistic of the timelines that "the professor" gives. The sovereign wealth fund is the one Im talking about. And since Ukraine is picking of oil production likes depots and refineries it will maybe be earlier

Outstanding chat. My thanks to the two of you. In future, I'd love to hear from someone about the health of Russia's economy, the part of it not directly associated with the war effort. What kind of an economy is it turning into? Also about impacts on the country's wealth and financial soundness.

Russia didn't collapse twice in the last 100 years. The Russian revolution was 1917.

Amzing idiot. Unblievable BS.

Still amazes me how stupid some people are to believe this properganda! Russia has said all along why, and how! Yet people don't listen!

Much better than expected. Dr Jack Watling clearly articulated answers to almost every question I had about the war in Ukraine. Well done!

Jake Broe speaks the truth - if Trump gets in America as we know it is finished 😔☠️

The Bilderberg Group controls Trump. That's why he can go bankrupt six times and keep his wealth. Trump can get caught for fraud to the tune of $455,000,000 dollars only to receive $1,000,000,000 almost out of thin air (Truth Social). Trump is protected by a secret society of billionaires that can buy SCOTUS or anyone who threatens their plans to end the United State's dominance.

Y suckers never defet russia

Trump never dares to leave NATO but to calibrate NATO to make NATO much stronger.

This hasn't aged well and its only been a month. Hodges should be sweeping floors somewhere.

Why wouldn't NATO help Russia defeat the Nazis in Ukraine???

Why wouldn't NATO IN help Russia defeat the Nazis in Ukraine???

Trump doesn't win, and Russia will become North Korea's 2nd.

Kharkiv did draw in ukr reserves but it also used 30-40,000 Russian forces away from the front they are trying to expand.

I was big supporter of Trump in 2016 but not this time. Now is not the time for him to get elected albeit we experiencing an immigration crisis at our border.

Both the government here in Ukraine and particularly its allies abroad are chronicly behind. We've only been able to stay in the fight because of Russian inadequacies, which are apparently diminishing. We're: 1. under-estimating the Ukrainian pessimism about each man's chances af surviving this war, all of which deters him to fight what is now commonly seen as being unwinnable. Major credit for blowing all the good opportunities goes to Joe Biden and Jake Sullivan. They've enable Putin's murder of tens of thousands and the destruction of Ukraine's economy by playing his escalation game. 2. likely going to need direct NATO intervention to avoid a Ukrainian defeat. This has a lot to do with Europe dragging its feet on defense production and enabling Putin to push out 4-million Ukrainian workers, consumers, and potential military personnel. The 1-million men that Europe is sheltering will eventually have to be replaced with European soldiers or we're likely looking at a Ukrainian defeat. 3. still not getting a solution from Kyiv on how we get back energy production and industry and actually get on with the business of rebuilding the Ukrainian economy. There are large swaths of the country that are defensible and strategically well situated, but Ukrainians are so stuck in their myopia that they cannot imagine things other than they have been. 4. not anticipating as much as we should China being the next nation to back-fill Putin's loss of tanks etc. This war will not be over by 2026 with the current NATO-member leadership. (Sure Trump will end the war by bringing the end of Ukraine, but what does that say about Europe that Scholz just willfully let Ukraine struggle with so few of the necessary capabilities.) Please pardon my indelicate words, but "frustrated" no longer defines my condition.

Ben Hodges, the voice of reason.

So we have F-16's and, probably more importantly, SAAB 340 preparing to deploy in Ukraine by the end of the year. As Dr Watling alluded, that's taken longer than it should have, and we risk making the same mistakes again with rationalisation of weapon and ammunition supply. My big concern for the medium-term is what AFV's we can supply to Ukraine, European NATO has given almost all it's spare stockpiles and now for Ukraine to get a decent flow of vehicles it will essentially need new ones (unless the US decides to send a lot more which currently seems unlikely), who is going to supply those vehicles and who will pay for them? NATO armoured vehicle production is pretty much a trickle of several expensive types with little commonality. A relatively simple, more mass produced range of vehicles will soon need to be produced and supplied to replace Ukrainian losses if they are going to reconstitute their armoured forces and train units to fight at higher than company/battalion level.

Mearsheimer seems to have the better take.

Nice point of view, but I will not bet on this, considering bunch of similar predictions year or two ago. I know public love this attitude of weak, disorganised and corrupted Russia, but obviously western inteligence and diplomacy was so wrong about it. Dehumanising and underestimating the rest of the world is main mistake of colonial empire, and this is obvious on battlefront and in economics.

Nice try, like they ran out of steam during the 2nd world war. Expert at b.s.

Russia cannot conquer Ukraine with NO NATO boots on the ground and NO NATO fighter in the skies ...

Konflikt vyhraje veliké RUSKO a jeho president PUTIN, Ukrajina padne do konce roku. Sláva hrdinnému ruskému lidu, konec fašismu v Evropě.

This is a very interesting interview but from it to me appears that there is no realistic way for Ukrainians to win this war and that perhaps for Ukrainians the war has been already lost. There are several reasons for such conclusion which I will briefly outline. The first one is Russo -Ukrainian expectations in terms of defining win in this war. While Russian objectives are more limited and realistic the Ukrainians set for themselves unachievable objectives. While Russians are proposing a model for a neutral Ukraine with loss of some territory for Ukraine, Ukrainians establishment talks of a full liberation of currently occupied territories. It doesn’t matter what is considered fair or ethical here but rather what is realistically achievable and at what cost. The second one is Dr Watling statement that Ukraine could win war if it was given “needed” resources it needs to win the war. However, those “needed” resources are very much a hypothetical concept which implies close to infinite resources given to Ukrainian disposal which Ukraine will not have even with a full and much bigger than up to date support by the West. Ukraine is running out of people willing to fight and the authorities resorted to literally hunting people on streets and sending them to the front. On the other hand, Russia is pretty much a canonical example of a state with limitless resources. The third point is complicated, but I will anyhow somehow try to elaborate it. Ukraine is as well a victim of Western and NATO ambition to be construct a European security framework without a significant participation of Russia. History however suggest that this is impossible to achieve without a strategic defeat of Rusia and its relegation from the status of great powers. While this is unlikely to happen, Russia identified Ukraine as an instrumental clog towards this Western strategy which looks as if will not end well for Ukraine. This component also means that most of us observing this war struggle to understand what Russians are doing as we are focused on the tactical aspect of the war. Therefore, we are obsessed who is winning/losing battles, who gains or loses certain territories, why the Russians do not launch a massive offensive etc. On the other hand, it increasingly appears that the Russians care about the tactical aspect and are strictly guided by their strategic objectives. We are observing the war from distance is often confused by Russian action in the war. We are preoccupied with the tactical component of the war -we observe various battles, question why Russian do not engage in a massive offensive. On the other hand, it looks as if Russians do not care about tactical aspect of the war, i think they observe it strictly through their strategic objectives. This probably means that they will not care about individual battles, temporary gains or losses of territories or the time frame of how long it takes them to achieve objectives. Longer it lasts it gets harder for Ukrainians and Ukraine gets closer to implosion. Unfortunately, this will not end well for Ukraine. At the end USA, Russia and China will find a new model and establish a new world order. Ukraine will pay a high price but the end game doesn’t look well for Europe too.

This was one of the, if not the best, exposure of what is really happening. Very good!

It will take years if not decades to "reenergize" your industrial base. How can a "General" not know this? It will take a generation just to train people to be able exploit any industry.

Supporting this stalemate meatgrinder war on either side is genocide at this point.

This gentle man has never served in the military. He's about as qualified as Tom Clancy when it comes to warfare.

Talking rubbish so go and fight him then

Rubbish 🗑

NATO is indrect in war with Russia so far, as NATO was established to destroy Russia and weaken Germany. NATO prepared and finance this war long time ahead. If someone says, it was unprovoqued, he/she has low knowledge about history and how NATO operates.

Ukraine will receive the interest from russia's money that is being held in the west 😂hahaha hahaha hahaha Ukraine just made it over the material hurdle with this money that russia just have no control over

Next year russia will exceed the number of casualties of america lost in the civil war

It can't be getting better for russia if they're losing thirteen hundred soldiers a day Have had to resort to motorcycles golf carts and scooby doo vans

Russia is using golf carts scooby doo.Vans and motorcycles cause they don't have armored personnel carriers

If baltic states know for a fact that invasion is imminent & the chances of deflecting it are slim, why not adopt 2nd amendment? Only way to make sure dictatorship never pass the gate

Nato usa Nazisterna kommer att förlora ingen vinner ett krig mot Ryssland

How much are they paying you to make such stupid declarations... ?